Second Sunday
after Epiphany
Thoughts for the Week - Fr. R. Taouk
18th January 2015
Obedience of the
Intellect by Fr. John A. Hardon S.J.
There are three
degrees of obedience, according to St. Ignatius. The first
and lowest is the obedience of execution which carries a
command into external effect, but without internal
submission of the intellect and will. This, says Ignatius,
scarcely merits the name of obedience. The second degree, or
obedience of the will, is praiseworthy and highly
meritorious because it involves the sacrifice of human
freedom for the love of God. At the highest level stands
obedience of the intellect which is possible because, except
in the face of intrinsic evidence to the contrary, the will
for its own motives can bend the understanding; it is
reasonable because nothing could be more intelligent than
submission of our minds to infinite wisdom; it is necessary
to insure proper subordination in a hierarchical society and
protect the subject from internal conflict; and it is
perfect because it immolates our noblest faculty and thereby
renders the greatest glory to the divine majesty.
Just as a religious
in obedience to his institute can be satisfied with external
observance, or can rise to conformity of his will and
intellect with the Superior, so a Catholic of whatever rank
may adopt the same three attitudes regarding the
commandments of the Church. And if he rises to the degree of
intellectual submission, his obedience has reached its
highest perfection, within the ambit of divine precept as
distinct from the evangelical counsels.
When St. Ignatius
urges obedience to the precepts of the Church, he recommends
this third degree, which requires a conformity of the whole
man with the dictates of authority: of his body for external
execution, his will for internal submission and his mind for
perfect consent. The function of the mind "is to find
reasons to defend" the Church's commandments against an
unruly tendency to disobedience partly occasioned by the
nature of the Christian religion, and partly determined by
the character of the precept and the attitude of the person
affected. For example, the Church tells me to assist at Mass
on Sunday under penalty of mortal sin. The human mind, no
matter how intelligent, will never see on purely rational
grounds why the Sunday precept should be so grave or even
why hearing Mass is important. Apart from revelation, a man
has no motive for going to Mass on Sunday and he will
naturally rebel against the imposition unless he has faith
and acts on the reasons that faith proposes for submitting
to the obligation. The fundamental reason is the Church's
divine mission, given to her by Christ, to establish laws
and prescribe their observance under pain of sin. The same
applies to all the commandments of the Church, and not only
the universal precepts but every command, even personal,
made by valid ecclesiastical authority. |